New posts

Reply to thread

Message

ok... i am not a holder but real curious.. this is a repost i put on another forum..

perhaps as very upbeat supporter, you could help me understand the strategy of presenting hocus-pocus like this to investors???

i was looking at the investor presentation released on 20th feb 2102

few questions

on page 6 they presented to domestic and international institutional and sophisticated investors a picture of their share price and volume

[ATTACH=full]80328[/ATTACH]

when i look at it, they are saying their average sp is above .043 from april to july 2011 with a few peaks above .045 and paeking to .047.. it then went below .04 and gained over .04 in september 2011 and in the recent months to february and including february 2011 they show .043

at the same time they are giving a very fair 0.029 cents which would seem like a bargain when you look at the sp being above .043 when they presented to the brokers..

but was it? is my commsec price graph more accurate a picture and representation of the real closing prices?

why would you present such a picture to domestic and international institutional and sophisticated investors?

imho the presentation misrepresented the actual sp by a considerable margin, so did the investors pay a premium way too high compared to what was being represented to them by AKK?

<blockquote data-quote="Agentm" data-source="post: 689251" data-attributes="member: 5119">ok... i am not a holder but real curious..&nbsp; this is a repost i put on another forum..perhaps as very upbeat supporter, you could help me understand the strategy of presenting hocus-pocus like this to investors???i was looking at the investor presentation released on 20th&nbsp; feb 2102few questionson&nbsp; page 6 they presented to domestic and international institutional and&nbsp; sophisticated investors a picture of their share price and volume[ATTACH=full]80328[/ATTACH]when&nbsp; i look at it, they are saying their average sp is above .043 from april&nbsp; to july 2011 with a few peaks above .045 and paeking to .047.. it then&nbsp; went below .04 and gained over .04 in september 2011 and in the recent&nbsp; months to february and including february 2011 they show .043at&nbsp; the same time they are giving a very fair 0.029 cents which would seem&nbsp; like a bargain when you look at the sp being above .043 when they&nbsp; presented to the brokers..but was it?&nbsp; is my commsec price graph more accurate a picture and representation of the real closing prices?why would you present such a picture to domestic and international institutional and sophisticated investors?imho&nbsp; the presentation misrepresented the actual sp by a considerable margin,&nbsp; so did the investors pay a premium way too high compared to what was&nbsp; being represented to them by AKK?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Agentm, post: 689251, member: 5119"] ok... i am not a holder but real curious.. this is a repost i put on another forum.. perhaps as very upbeat supporter, you could help me understand the strategy of presenting hocus-pocus like this to investors??? i was looking at the investor presentation released on 20th feb 2102 few questions on page 6 they presented to domestic and international institutional and sophisticated investors a picture of their share price and volume [ATTACH=full]80328[/ATTACH] when i look at it, they are saying their average sp is above .043 from april to july 2011 with a few peaks above .045 and paeking to .047.. it then went below .04 and gained over .04 in september 2011 and in the recent months to february and including february 2011 they show .043 at the same time they are giving a very fair 0.029 cents which would seem like a bargain when you look at the sp being above .043 when they presented to the brokers.. but was it? is my commsec price graph more accurate a picture and representation of the real closing prices? why would you present such a picture to domestic and international institutional and sophisticated investors? imho the presentation misrepresented the actual sp by a considerable margin, so did the investors pay a premium way too high compared to what was being represented to them by AKK? [/QUOTE]

Verification