Normal
[ATTACH]58478[/ATTACH]I enjoyed your post history on this thread more. Anyway, if s/he should return, you can feel free to point out that the back-dated, selected and unverified trade in AAPL: NAS returned 8.3% over the period. This compares to the NASDAQ index return over the same period of 7.1%. Hardly the kind of thing to illustrate some sort of massive stock picking ability, particularly (if) in the presence of hindsight.Furthermore, of the 2512 stocks in the NASDAQ Composite which had a complete history over the same time period, AAPL was ranked 1300. In other words, one of my beloved NASA Monkeys would probably have done better. In contrast to the cost of a formal course, their consulting rate is peanuts.
[ATTACH]58478[/ATTACH]
I enjoyed your post history on this thread more.
Anyway, if s/he should return, you can feel free to point out that the back-dated, selected and unverified trade in AAPL: NAS returned 8.3% over the period. This compares to the NASDAQ index return over the same period of 7.1%. Hardly the kind of thing to illustrate some sort of massive stock picking ability, particularly (if) in the presence of hindsight.
Furthermore, of the 2512 stocks in the NASDAQ Composite which had a complete history over the same time period, AAPL was ranked 1300. In other words, one of my beloved NASA Monkeys would probably have done better. In contrast to the cost of a formal course, their consulting rate is peanuts.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.
