Normal
I was doing some tinkering the other day while home from work with a bum knee and came up with an "uneducated" calculation of what Cooljarloo means to Image.I used the drilling results of target 2 posted in the quarterly report which was a part of the claimed 100% image owned 120km of HM targets in Cooljarloo.Now don't quote me on this as i have no idea of all the factors involved in the estimate process, i only used my humble logic.Variables:L= Length; 120km announcedW= Width; Median width from a couple of news reports ~ 30m (news reports claimed 20-70meters, can't find the link where is saw that now )D= Depth; Using an average depth of HM drilling by the 192 drilling results. Average from report = 6.182291667Simple volume calculation to start with, all units converted to meters (m):V= L x W x DV= 120,000 x 30 x 6.18 = 22,248,000m ³Average % Heavy Minerals of the samples retrieved from the 192 holes was 5.957291667, so:Volume of HM = 0.0596 x 22,248,000 =1,325,980.8cm ³ A little research and i learn mineral sands have on average 4.5 times the specific gravity of water. Which entails that if 1m ³ of water weighs 1 ton then 70,852m ³ of HM equals:70,852 x 4.5 = 5,966,913 tonnes O.K. so this would be the perfect result, i know thats not likely so I'll take half of that. 2,983,456 tonnes. Thats still ridiculous!If you change the HM% grade to a low grade 1.1%, you get 244,728m ³ ~1,101,276tonnes.Using this low grade guesstimate and using average distribution shown on Wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mineral_sands Zircon 10% = 110,127 @ $400/ton ($800 spot price)= 44,050,800 Rutile 10% = 110,127 @ $250/ton ($500spot) = 27,531,750Ilmenite 20% = 220,255 @ $44/ton ($88spot) = 9,691,220 Luexcoxene 5% = 55,063 @ $211/ton ($422spot) = 11,618,293Junk 55% = 605,701Total = $92,892,063I have no idea how much it costs to mine the stuff nor do i have any idea how mining companies value the estimates, nor do i know how the distribution of the mineral content should be, but considering this is only the first discovery and the others are supposed to be even bigger i think its a pretty good sign.Undiluted shares are knocking around 82,214,642 as at Dec 2007. Market value for the company at this time is around $106mil ($1.30).This is my first attempt at this, I would be interested to hear what you think .I welcome the criticism. Tukker
I was doing some tinkering the other day while home from work with a bum knee and came up with an "uneducated" calculation of what Cooljarloo means to Image.
I used the drilling results of target 2 posted in the quarterly report which was a part of the claimed 100% image owned 120km of HM targets in Cooljarloo.
Now don't quote me on this as i have no idea of all the factors involved in the estimate process, i only used my humble logic.
Variables:
L= Length; 120km announced
W= Width; Median width from a couple of news reports ~ 30m (news reports claimed 20-70meters, can't find the link where is saw that now )
D= Depth; Using an average depth of HM drilling by the 192 drilling results. Average from report = 6.182291667
Simple volume calculation to start with, all units converted to meters (m):
V= L x W x D
V= 120,000 x 30 x 6.18
= 22,248,000m ³
Average % Heavy Minerals of the samples retrieved from the 192 holes was 5.957291667, so:
Volume of HM = 0.0596 x 22,248,000
=1,325,980.8cm ³
A little research and i learn mineral sands have on average 4.5 times the specific gravity of water. Which entails that if 1m ³ of water weighs 1 ton then 70,852m ³ of HM equals:
70,852 x 4.5 = 5,966,913 tonnes
O.K. so this would be the perfect result, i know thats not likely so I'll take half of that. 2,983,456 tonnes. Thats still ridiculous!
If you change the HM% grade to a low grade 1.1%, you get 244,728m ³ ~1,101,276tonnes.
Using this low grade guesstimate and using average distribution shown on Wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mineral_sands
Zircon 10% = 110,127 @ $400/ton ($800 spot price)= 44,050,800
Rutile 10% = 110,127 @ $250/ton ($500spot) = 27,531,750
Ilmenite 20% = 220,255 @ $44/ton ($88spot) = 9,691,220
Luexcoxene 5% = 55,063 @ $211/ton ($422spot) = 11,618,293
Junk 55% = 605,701
Total = $92,892,063
I have no idea how much it costs to mine the stuff nor do i have any idea how mining companies value the estimates, nor do i know how the distribution of the mineral content should be, but considering this is only the first discovery and the others are supposed to be even bigger i think its a pretty good sign.
Undiluted shares are knocking around 82,214,642 as at Dec 2007. Market value for the company at this time is around $106mil ($1.30).
This is my first attempt at this, I would be interested to hear what you think .
I welcome the criticism.
Tukker
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.