Normal
Indeed you are correct, seems i forgot to change the #'s around when i adjusted the channel length.I had originally done the calculations using a channel length of only 60km instead of 120km, thats why i had that 70,852m ³. The remainder of the calculations remain correct to my understanding, which doesn't really account for a whole lot ::.
Indeed you are correct, seems i forgot to change the #'s around when i adjusted the channel length.
I had originally done the calculations using a channel length of only 60km instead of 120km, thats why i had that 70,852m ³. The remainder of the calculations remain correct to my understanding, which doesn't really account for a whole lot ::.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.
