Normal
How many "analog" chart analysis have been blown out of the water since 2009? I would say: all of them.How many more would it take before people start to accept that it's not a valid forecasting method purely on empirical outcomes? Even if it turns out that this particular analog forecasts the next crash perfectly, at best we can say a broken clock is right twice a day, considering how many similar analysis have turned out bunk.Safehaven has a small handful of good contributors on their blogroll (those who are already widely read elsewhere), but otherwise it is a great place to visit if you want to lose some money (speaking from experience).
How many "analog" chart analysis have been blown out of the water since 2009? I would say: all of them.
How many more would it take before people start to accept that it's not a valid forecasting method purely on empirical outcomes? Even if it turns out that this particular analog forecasts the next crash perfectly, at best we can say a broken clock is right twice a day, considering how many similar analysis have turned out bunk.
Safehaven has a small handful of good contributors on their blogroll (those who are already widely read elsewhere), but otherwise it is a great place to visit if you want to lose some money (speaking from experience).
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.
