Normal
which is why you need to distill the issue down to MANDATORY vs OPTIONAL.Protecting "innocent" children is and should always be the personal responsibility of their parents.Parents that abbrogate that responsibilty (effectively givin it to the nanny state) should, imho, be charged with neglect.And as anyone that has ever been a ward of the state or kept up with the news surrounding so called "state care" would know, the State makes a very very very poor substitute parent. Often far worse crimes are committed against children that are in or have been in the care of the state or religious institutions.Tell your senators and federal member to stick to the issue at hand. Just remind them the state does a very poor job of "taking care of children".
which is why you need to distill the issue down to MANDATORY vs OPTIONAL.
Protecting "innocent" children is and should always be the personal responsibility of their parents.
Parents that abbrogate that responsibilty (effectively givin it to the nanny state) should, imho, be charged with neglect.
And as anyone that has ever been a ward of the state or kept up with the news surrounding so called "state care" would know, the State makes a very very very poor substitute parent. Often far worse crimes are committed against children that are in or have been in the care of the state or religious institutions.
Tell your senators and federal member to stick to the issue at hand. Just remind them the state does a very poor job of "taking care of children".
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.
