New posts

Reply to thread

Message

Unfortunately a result of the shonky operators out there flooding this game. My cousin lost everything to one of these guys. I guess that's where my skepticism comes in.

To a large extent, yes.

Original ideas, think counter-intuitively, understand what drives price action. Perhaps take an existing idea and make enough transformations/improvements to really make it your own.

I have my ideas on how to be profitable and they're pretty different (and not up for discussion) but hey, I'm sure there are literally thousands of ways to drag profits from the game. And yes, your presumption is correct; I'd better be careful here, kennas might want to see audited statements :

----

Back to the WTT system. I have coded it, it works on ASX and US data, it's not something I would trade because it doesn't meet my objectives. If low maintenance trend following is your thing it's probably worth a look. Do your own validation, it only costs US$9.53 to buy the idea, or free if your clever enough... Code it, validate it and do it (I think that's roughly what Nick says!).

<blockquote data-quote="rb250660" data-source="post: 842554" data-attributes="member: 51435">Unfortunately a result of the shonky operators out there flooding this game. My cousin lost everything to one of these guys. I guess that&#039;s where my skepticism comes in.To a large extent, yes.Original ideas, think counter-intuitively, understand what drives price action. Perhaps take an existing idea and make enough transformations/improvements to really make it your own.I have my ideas on how to be profitable and they&#039;re pretty different (and not up for discussion) but hey, I&#039;m sure there are literally thousands of ways to drag profits from the game. And yes, your presumption is correct; I&#039;d better be careful here, kennas might want to see audited statements <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" />:----Back to the WTT system. I have coded it, it works on ASX and US data, it&#039;s not something I would trade because it doesn&#039;t meet my objectives. If low maintenance trend following is your thing it&#039;s probably worth a look. Do your own validation, it only costs US$9.53 to buy the idea, or free if your clever enough... Code it, validate it and do it (I think that&#039;s roughly what Nick says!).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="rb250660, post: 842554, member: 51435"] Unfortunately a result of the shonky operators out there flooding this game. My cousin lost everything to one of these guys. I guess that's where my skepticism comes in. To a large extent, yes. Original ideas, think counter-intuitively, understand what drives price action. Perhaps take an existing idea and make enough transformations/improvements to really make it your own. I have my ideas on how to be profitable and they're pretty different (and not up for discussion) but hey, I'm sure there are literally thousands of ways to drag profits from the game. And yes, your presumption is correct; I'd better be careful here, kennas might want to see audited statements :p: ---- Back to the WTT system. I have coded it, it works on ASX and US data, it's not something I would trade because it doesn't meet my objectives. If low maintenance trend following is your thing it's probably worth a look. Do your own validation, it only costs US$9.53 to buy the idea, or free if your clever enough... Code it, validate it and do it (I think that's roughly what Nick says!). [/QUOTE]

Verification