Reply to thread

Ah, the climate alarmists twins.

Can't put up an argument

As usual, no evidence put forward about the level of traction or otherwise.

The paper was only accepted on May 15th, but you have already been able to determine it has gained no traction.

And why did it it have to explain the the centuries of continuing increased atmospheric energy, its just another of your red herrings to make it look like you know what you are talking about.

And again, how do you know whether this paper cannot get peer review or not?

Any shred of evidence, or just another bit of pompous BS?

You are just as bad as the RWNJ who say climate change does not exist, just an extremist on the other end of the spectrum.

Mick