Normal
No you can't as you have to deny the many recognised series of temperature that are used. They differ marginally over time because they use different methodologies to derive global temperatures from real world data. These methodologies are all explained in great detail, and can be improved over time as a better understanding of the range of data and how and where it was derived comes to hand.Except the real world temperature data does not change and the trend is undeniable irrespective of which methodology you choose.I don't know what your definition of extremism is, but smarter people than most of us have spent their entire careers coming to grips with the effects of climate on the planet, and laid that out in writing, based on a range of settings. You need to read the IPCC Reports that show the likely effects of continuing temperature increases. They are dire if GHG emissions are not just curbed, but turned around.
No you can't as you have to deny the many recognised series of temperature that are used. They differ marginally over time because they use different methodologies to derive global temperatures from real world data. These methodologies are all explained in great detail, and can be improved over time as a better understanding of the range of data and how and where it was derived comes to hand.
Except the real world temperature data does not change and the trend is undeniable irrespective of which methodology you choose.
I don't know what your definition of extremism is, but smarter people than most of us have spent their entire careers coming to grips with the effects of climate on the planet, and laid that out in writing, based on a range of settings.
You need to read the IPCC Reports that show the likely effects of continuing temperature increases. They are dire if GHG emissions are not just curbed, but turned around.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.
