Normal
The per capita argument and any similar doesn't wash, particularly for Australia and our contributions to global warming. The hypothesis is CO2 up, temp up. Not CO2 per capita up, temp up. The atmosphere doesn't care where the CO2 comes from, how much soot is in the air, what fertility rates are or how poor a country is, it's supposed to be just the global mix of GHGs in the troposphere. People arguing the per capita case clearly have an agenda that's not related to preventing the oceans from boiling.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.
