New posts

Reply to thread

Message

The argument is to do with identifying where the most CO2 is being generated and in that case trying to identify how to reduce the carbon footprint of those major emitters.

So take Australia for example. If we were able to move to a totally renewable energy base for our industrial, commercial and domestic energy needs our CO2 emissions would drastically reduce. No coal, little gas, little petrol or diesel. Our per capita CO2 emissions would be a fraction of their current amount.

If we were able to produce green steel another big cut. Same with Cement production.

On top of that a massive program to sequester carbon in soils via , say biochar, re vegetation, regenerative agriculture would enable a reversal of CO2 production.

[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.csiro.au/en/research/environmental-impacts/climate-change/Climate-change-QA/Sources-of-GHG-gases[/URL]
[URL unfurl="true"]https://theconversation.com/australia-can-stop-greenhouse-gas-emissions-by-2050-heres-how-44175[/URL]

<blockquote data-quote="basilio" data-source="post: 1234617" data-attributes="member: 18692">The argument is to do with identifying where the most CO2 is being generated and in that case trying to identify how to reduce the carbon footprint of those major emitters. So take Australia for example.&nbsp; If we were able to move to a totally renewable energy base for our industrial, commercial and domestic energy needs our CO2 emissions would drastically reduce.&nbsp; No coal, little gas, little petrol or diesel. Our per capita CO2 emissions would be&nbsp; a fraction of their current amount.If we were able to produce green steel another big cut.&nbsp; Same with Cement production.On top of that a&nbsp; massive program to sequester carbon in soils via , say biochar, re vegetation, regenerative agriculture would enable a reversal of CO2 production. [URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://www.csiro.au/en/research/environmental-impacts/climate-change/Climate-change-QA/Sources-of-GHG-gases[/URL][URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://theconversation.com/australia-can-stop-greenhouse-gas-emissions-by-2050-heres-how-44175[/URL]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="basilio, post: 1234617, member: 18692"] The argument is to do with identifying where the most CO2 is being generated and in that case trying to identify how to reduce the carbon footprint of those major emitters. So take Australia for example. If we were able to move to a totally renewable energy base for our industrial, commercial and domestic energy needs our CO2 emissions would drastically reduce. No coal, little gas, little petrol or diesel. Our per capita CO2 emissions would be a fraction of their current amount. If we were able to produce green steel another big cut. Same with Cement production. On top of that a massive program to sequester carbon in soils via , say biochar, re vegetation, regenerative agriculture would enable a reversal of CO2 production. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.csiro.au/en/research/environmental-impacts/climate-change/Climate-change-QA/Sources-of-GHG-gases[/URL] [URL unfurl="true"]https://theconversation.com/australia-can-stop-greenhouse-gas-emissions-by-2050-heres-how-44175[/URL] [/QUOTE]

Verification