Normal
If you understood the concept of an increasing rate of change you would know it had nothing to do with the X and Y axis.Not true as the data shows it was cooler from 1500 to 1700. Nor is there an iota of scientific evidence that there was any "natural cycling".This has been well explained, so another falsehood. You seem to have no idea of the role of aerosols in mitigating temperature increases.There's actually a strong positive correlation, and here's where you could have gone to learn something:[ATTACH=full]160477[/ATTACH]When did central England's temperature record equate to the planets? If you had a clue about determining global trends in climate you would know that using averages over 20 years (minimum) was necessary so that decadal-level countertrends could be ruled out. Choosing a single 30 year period is cherry picking, made worse by failing to use a global standard.UAH and RSS use exactly the same data source, but adopt different methodologies (algorithms). Neither reflects the surface temperature (HADCRUT charted below).In any case all the data series confirm the trend of an increasing rate of change of temperature, with UAH data showing a greater increase than RSS when using the 20-year average.[ATTACH=full]160475[/ATTACH]
If you understood the concept of an increasing rate of change you would know it had nothing to do with the X and Y axis.
Not true as the data shows it was cooler from 1500 to 1700. Nor is there an iota of scientific evidence that there was any "natural cycling".
This has been well explained, so another falsehood. You seem to have no idea of the role of aerosols in mitigating temperature increases.
There's actually a strong positive correlation, and here's where you could have gone to learn something:
[ATTACH=full]160477[/ATTACH]
When did central England's temperature record equate to the planets?
If you had a clue about determining global trends in climate you would know that using averages over 20 years (minimum) was necessary so that decadal-level countertrends could be ruled out. Choosing a single 30 year period is cherry picking, made worse by failing to use a global standard.
UAH and RSS use exactly the same data source, but adopt different methodologies (algorithms). Neither reflects the surface temperature (HADCRUT charted below).
In any case all the data series confirm the trend of an increasing rate of change of temperature, with UAH data showing a greater increase than RSS when using the 20-year average.
[ATTACH=full]160475[/ATTACH]
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.
