Normal
tech/aI don't think that it will.You can see from the multiplicity of opinions, that just the simple definition of risk had some rather disparate views.If we (as a collective forum) build the model in a logical progression, then whatever model is eventually selected by individuals, they can have a transparent progression, and follow the logic of the construction process.Teaching how to fish, as opposed to tossing out free fish.Therefore under the variety of sub-headings we have the different elements that should at least be considered, as will be discovered, not all risk management methodologies can be employed, nor all risk negated.jog ond998
tech/a
I don't think that it will.
You can see from the multiplicity of opinions, that just the simple definition of risk had some rather disparate views.
If we (as a collective forum) build the model in a logical progression, then whatever model is eventually selected by individuals, they can have a transparent progression, and follow the logic of the construction process.
Teaching how to fish, as opposed to tossing out free fish.
Therefore under the variety of sub-headings we have the different elements that should at least be considered, as will be discovered, not all risk management methodologies can be employed, nor all risk negated.
jog on
d998
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.
