Normal
tech/aThere has been previous mention of the tested parametres........and should TT approach, or exceed drawdown, then it would be closed as the methodology has failed.Now, by *outperforming* as apparently it has;Does this constitute *failure* of the methodology?Is outperformance considered a risk, viz. failure of methodology as tested?Initial risk could well have been higher than 15% (unless utilizing the guaranteed stops)Now, you are safe, agreed.Without having access to all the trades taken, both open and closed, no accurate assessment can be made as to the true profitability.Just a dollar return means nothing, apart from it tells me you might be able to afford to feed me.jog ond998
tech/a
There has been previous mention of the tested parametres........and should TT approach, or exceed drawdown, then it would be closed as the methodology has failed.
Now, by *outperforming* as apparently it has;
Does this constitute *failure* of the methodology?
Is outperformance considered a risk, viz. failure of methodology as tested?
Initial risk could well have been higher than 15% (unless utilizing the guaranteed stops)
Now, you are safe, agreed.
Without having access to all the trades taken, both open and closed, no accurate assessment can be made as to the true profitability.
Just a dollar return means nothing, apart from it tells me you might be able to afford to feed me.
jog on
d998
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.