Normal
Lesm.Some nice stuff and contructive thought.I will reply at length whan I have more time.Just knocking off work now!!I might say that I feel we are on the same page,Trades arent taken on positive expectancy alone,as I dont know from one trade to the next what that calculation may be---only that by sticking to the method the expectancy should(and has so far) return the expectancy of extensive testing.Thanks for your input---yes we will also try and keep the risk issue focused but I feel that all aspects be at least discussed in brief as they are now.Finally T/T isnt presented as "THE Trading model of models" it performs well but falls way short in my view to anything approaching perfection---still happy to trade it though. Any input as always with regard to the method which is an on going project with me is most welcome.More later.
Lesm.
Some nice stuff and contructive thought.
I will reply at length whan I have more time.
Just knocking off work now!!
I might say that I feel we are on the same page,Trades arent taken on positive expectancy alone,as I dont know from one trade to the next what that calculation may be---only that by sticking to the method the expectancy should(and has so far) return the expectancy of extensive testing.
Thanks for your input---yes we will also try and keep the risk issue focused but I feel that all aspects be at least discussed in brief as they are now.
Finally T/T isnt presented as "THE Trading model of models" it performs well but falls way short in my view to anything approaching perfection---still happy to trade it though. Any input as always with regard to the method which is an on going project with me is most welcome.
More later.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.