New posts

Reply to thread

Message

This tangental and only anecdotal to the themes above;
Ten odd years ago I had cause to make a cliam on 'income loss' due to motor vehical accident injury under a compulsary insurance aspect of my (at the time) Industry fund, a component I kept at the bear minimum... Lets just say that it was a very unsatisfactory expirence.
I'd like to know of anyone who has had a 'satisfactory one'.
The onerousness of the legalise is developed to make every aspect more time than it's worth.
If there's a Union worth starting? It would be Insurance paying SuperFund members. That might go a ways toward cleaning up the act.

The scope for malfeasance in this area of the super industry was made clear by how little attention it was given in the Banking Royal Commission. From memory it had a hour or two on one afternoon.

<blockquote data-quote="orr" data-source="post: 1223631" data-attributes="member: 16899">This tangental and only&nbsp; anecdotal to the themes above; Ten odd years ago I had cause to make a cliam on &#039;income loss&#039;&nbsp; due to motor vehical accident injury under a&nbsp; compulsary insurance aspect of&nbsp; my (at the time) Industry fund, a component I kept at the bear minimum...&nbsp; &nbsp; Lets just say that it was a very unsatisfactory expirence.I&#039;d like to know of anyone who has had&nbsp; a &#039;satisfactory one&#039;.The onerousness of the legalise is developed to make every aspect more time than it&#039;s worth. If there&#039;s a Union worth starting?&nbsp; It would be Insurance paying SuperFund members.&nbsp; That might go a ways toward cleaning up the act. &nbsp;&nbsp;The scope for malfeasance in this area of the super industry was made clear by how little attention it was given in the Banking Royal Commission. From memory it had a hour or two on one afternoon.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="orr, post: 1223631, member: 16899"] This tangental and only anecdotal to the themes above; Ten odd years ago I had cause to make a cliam on 'income loss' due to motor vehical accident injury under a compulsary insurance aspect of my (at the time) Industry fund, a component I kept at the bear minimum... Lets just say that it was a very unsatisfactory expirence. I'd like to know of anyone who has had a 'satisfactory one'. The onerousness of the legalise is developed to make every aspect more time than it's worth. If there's a Union worth starting? It would be Insurance paying SuperFund members. That might go a ways toward cleaning up the act. The scope for malfeasance in this area of the super industry was made clear by how little attention it was given in the Banking Royal Commission. From memory it had a hour or two on one afternoon. [/QUOTE]

Verification