Reply to thread

Firstly, the fact that "fluoridation has been around for soooo long" isn't evidence of it's safety... just that it's been around for so long... which comes back to the earlier point that the fluoride waste disposal industry threw so much money at trying to change laws, to pay out civil suits with confidentially clauses, to stack regulatory and advisory positions including WHO committees with their own people so as to direct the type of research done regarding fluoridation via their terms of reference and controlling official funding, ie to get the results they wanted to promote.

There is plenty of credible evidence that fluoride, especially fluoride that comes as an industrial by-product containing arsenic, lead, cadmium and other heavy metals or toxins is a health hazard, no matter how small the doseage. It's just that like asbestos, thalamide, DDT etc and particularly like the tobacco industry, they infiltrated the ranks of the regulatory and medical authorities to not only condem and discredit research against their product but to actually promote their knowingly toxic product in medical journals as safe.

Through advertisements appearing in the pages of medical journals for the first time in the 1930s, tobacco companies worked to develop close, mutually beneficial relationships with physicians and their professional organizations. See  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1470496/

Then of course they insert indemnity clauses into the fluoridation legislation to try to prevent anyone from suing the fluoridation industry. See The Qld Water Fluoridation Act 2008, Part 9 Matters relating to liability and indemnity sec 92 to 98. Sec 94 sums it up.

94   Protection from civil rights and remedies

   A person does not have any civil right or remedy against a

   public potable water supplier in relation to the fluoridation of

   a public potable water supply under this Act.

As I said in the outset, despite the evidence being there to show it wasn't safe, many products went into commercial distribution for considerable time before they were finally stopped. Asbestos and Tobacco are notable examples of how blatant lies and corruption of the health and regulatory systems gets deadly products into the consumers enviornment.

Secondly, while you deny the fact that the system is corruptable or at least able to be mislead by false research and advice, your "professionalism" is open to question by definition of history.

...and finally, this is no joking matter!