Normal
Sigh (for the want of a decent understanding/interpretation of what I posted)OK, there are 2 points to be made.1. I (that's me) agreed that there is the possibility of corruption.2. I infer that it is up to YOU to provide an opinion as to why the medical profession should want to intentionally be deceiptful wrt safety / cost-benefits. So go on, stop slandering, and provide some evidence.You are trying to make a strawman argument. I stand by my totally consistent position, and note that in the quoted post, you have failed to answer the question as to why someone in the medical profession would want to harm someone with fluoride.
Sigh (for the want of a decent understanding/interpretation of what I posted)
OK, there are 2 points to be made.
1. I (that's me) agreed that there is the possibility of corruption.
2. I infer that it is up to YOU to provide an opinion as to why the medical profession should want to intentionally be deceiptful wrt safety / cost-benefits.
So go on, stop slandering, and provide some evidence.
You are trying to make a strawman argument. I stand by my totally consistent position, and note that in the quoted post, you have failed to answer the question as to why someone in the medical profession would want to harm someone with fluoride.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.
