Normal
Your figures might be a bit out of date.According to the ABS , for the 2021 - 2022 year,[ATTACH=full]171901[/ATTACH]Note that the increase in regional Australia is the same as that of the capital cities.For the capital city growth, the immigration was 50% higher than the natural growth via new births.In capital cities, the internal migration is negative 47 k.By default, those 47k people must have gone to the regional areas.Note also that in the previous year when COVID smashed the immigration figures, there was anegative growth in Capital cities, yet the non capitals still achieved a growth of 1%, which would have been largely made up by the negative growth from internal migration of the cities.[ATTACH=full]171906[/ATTACH]Mick
Your figures might be a bit out of date.
According to the ABS , for the 2021 - 2022 year,
[ATTACH=full]171901[/ATTACH]
Note that the increase in regional Australia is the same as that of the capital cities.
For the capital city growth, the immigration was 50% higher than the natural growth via new births.
In capital cities, the internal migration is negative 47 k.
By default, those 47k people must have gone to the regional areas.
Note also that in the previous year when COVID smashed the immigration figures, there was anegative growth in Capital cities, yet the non capitals still achieved a growth of 1%, which would have been largely made up by the negative growth from internal migration of the cities.
[ATTACH=full]171906[/ATTACH]
Mick
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.
