New posts

Reply to thread

Message

So currently Russia is pretty much unopposed in the Artic. They have been expanding into the Arctic and a lot closer to the US.

You also have China investing into Greenland and trying to get a foothold.

Once that ice melts there will be new trade routes going through. Greenland will have strategic positioning over shipping routes.

And yes there's a whole heap of minerals, Fishing stock.

It's all geared for conflict at the artic. We will find out as China powers on in the Antarctic. Or are we pretend they aren't mapping resources. It's a big reason Australia is in the danger zone as well.

I wouldn't be surprised if Ukraine wasn't an indirect weakening attempt by NATO.
Look at the facts:
Finland and Sweden joined NATO after the Ukraine war began. That means NATO bases up there.
NATO has greater control over Arctic routes.
Russia had to pull funding out of the artic.
They also took some heavy losses to their artic troops who were sent to Ukraine I'm sure.
The Arctic council now has a lot of westerners over Russia.
western sanctions also crippled Russia oil and gas.
I don't think the war in Ukraine was specifically about the artic. But to some extent the Ukrainians are being used to weaken Russia for strategic reasons in the Artic.

I didn't really think much about it before until Trump started going on about Greenland. I think there is a long-term plan in place to cripple Russia and get those minerals and other goodies.

Trump however knows that the Euro trash want it for themselves. They will stiff the yanks out of the deal and that's what we are seeing today. Negative press in Europe and a sudden will to build military stock. I definitely think something is going on

<blockquote data-quote="moXJO" data-source="post: 1323547" data-attributes="member: 4631">So currently Russia is pretty much unopposed in the Artic. They have been expanding into the Arctic and a lot closer to the US.You also have China investing into Greenland and trying to get a foothold. Once that ice melts there will be new trade routes going through. Greenland will have strategic positioning over shipping routes. And yes there&#039;s a whole heap of minerals, Fishing stock.It&#039;s all geared for conflict at the artic. We will find out as China powers on in the Antarctic. Or are we pretend they aren&#039;t mapping resources. It&#039;s a big reason Australia is in the danger zone as well. I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if Ukraine wasn&#039;t an indirect weakening attempt by NATO. Look at the facts:Finland and Sweden joined NATO after the Ukraine war began. That means NATO bases up there.NATO has greater control over Arctic routes.Russia had to pull funding out of the artic.They also took some heavy losses to their artic troops who were sent to Ukraine I&#039;m sure.The Arctic council now has a lot of westerners over Russia. western sanctions also crippled Russia oil and gas.I don&#039;t think the war in Ukraine was specifically about the artic. But to some extent the Ukrainians are being used to weaken Russia for strategic reasons in the Artic.I didn&#039;t really think much about it before until Trump started going on about Greenland. I think there is a long-term plan in place to cripple Russia and get those minerals and other goodies. Trump however knows that the Euro trash want it for themselves. They will stiff the yanks out of the deal and that&#039;s what we are seeing today. Negative press in Europe and a sudden will to build military stock. I definitely think something is going on</blockquote>

[QUOTE="moXJO, post: 1323547, member: 4631"] So currently Russia is pretty much unopposed in the Artic. They have been expanding into the Arctic and a lot closer to the US. You also have China investing into Greenland and trying to get a foothold. Once that ice melts there will be new trade routes going through. Greenland will have strategic positioning over shipping routes. And yes there's a whole heap of minerals, Fishing stock. It's all geared for conflict at the artic. We will find out as China powers on in the Antarctic. Or are we pretend they aren't mapping resources. It's a big reason Australia is in the danger zone as well. I wouldn't be surprised if Ukraine wasn't an indirect weakening attempt by NATO. Look at the facts: Finland and Sweden joined NATO after the Ukraine war began. That means NATO bases up there. NATO has greater control over Arctic routes. Russia had to pull funding out of the artic. They also took some heavy losses to their artic troops who were sent to Ukraine I'm sure. The Arctic council now has a lot of westerners over Russia. western sanctions also crippled Russia oil and gas. I don't think the war in Ukraine was specifically about the artic. But to some extent the Ukrainians are being used to weaken Russia for strategic reasons in the Artic. I didn't really think much about it before until Trump started going on about Greenland. I think there is a long-term plan in place to cripple Russia and get those minerals and other goodies. Trump however knows that the Euro trash want it for themselves. They will stiff the yanks out of the deal and that's what we are seeing today. Negative press in Europe and a sudden will to build military stock. I definitely think something is going on [/QUOTE]

Verification