- Joined
- 2 June 2011
- Posts
- 5,341
- Reactions
- 242
I'll be interested to see how long he lasts in the embassy. I doubt the UK will ever allow him to leave.
It's a long shot, but if he can get elected as a "Wikileaks Party" member here in Australia, he should be provided with political immunity on that basis, no?
I don't think so. It might be extended as a courtesy by the UK, but then what about Sweden, which has a legitimate arrest warrant forAssange.
"We know that the UK police were instructed (in the Sweden case) to break international law and arrest me even if I was in a diplomatic vehicle and had diplomatic immunity."
Sinner, perhaps you're overlooking the possible reality that Rudd entirely agrees with Julia Gillard's stand on this?At the very least, taking into consideration all of your concerns and issues raised, I would still like to see something from Rudd on this. Send consular officials to the Ecuador embassy. Make a statement rebuking any idiocy stated by Julia Gillard around Assange being a criminal under Australian law and having his passport revoked. Register a complaint with the US against their pursuit of him, which they have not done so far despite the US presenting them many opportunites to do so. Anything.
Probably right I guess, he has said this previously
Sinner, perhaps you're overlooking the possible reality that Rudd entirely agrees with Julia Gillard's stand on this?
Assange has knowingly acted against the interests of multiple governments, so it's a bit hard to see why they should be sympathetic toward him.
down the slippery slope. ........... but we can (still, for a little while) hope.
If they can prove he was an active, and not a passive participant, he'll never get out.The new indictment does not add additional counts to the prior 18-count superseding indictment returned against Assange in May 2019. It does, however, broaden the scope of the conspiracy surrounding alleged computer intrusions with which Assange was previously charged. According to the charging document, Assange and others at WikiLeaks recruited and agreed with hackers to commit computer intrusions to benefit WikiLeaks.
He is finished if he does give the source in a professional sense. Surely he wouldn't sell out.https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/wikileaks-founder-charged-superseding-indictment
He's in deep(er) **** now.
If they can prove he was an active, and not a passive participant, he'll never get out.
Maybe giving the source of the DNC email hack is the only card he's got left.
Dunno? Does seem like a pressure play from the DOJ.He is finished if he does give the source in a professional sense. Surely he wouldn't sell out.
And Assange can do this much holed up in a purgatory like Bellmash. Imagine what he'll be able to achive from Heaven; only After a life well lived, in freedom post this injustice...Wiki leaks just did a massive dump.
Holy moly
https://file.wikileaks.org/file/?fb...JmxQSYmjZdG8OSxaaFV20k0TsZrcMrFbGQA6Ri6Qr2XDg
Any chance?
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.