- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,349
- Reactions
- 24,086
You and I know applying common sense doesn't come into it, businesses want easy access to HV transmission lines, everyone else wants easy access to compensation, there is no easy outcome.Bottom line is we've got vast areas of land in Australia that aren't good for much at all. Meanwhile transmission lines, even long ones, are absolutely 100% proven technology.
So there's simply no reason to be putting solar farms on prime agricultural land. It's just not sensible unless we're talking about a few panels to run something on the farm.
Trouble is, land use isn't something we're overly good at rationally sorting out......
When the HV infrastructure was first put in, everyone was cheering it on, as it meant an improvement in their standard of living.
Now everyone has that standard of living, an increase in standard of living, can only come through compensation. ?
So it becomes the squeaky hinge issue, do we sacrifice productive land to get private renewable investment, or do we subsidise it to have it relocated to non productive areas and carry the cost of extra HV infrastructure, ah decisions, decisions.
The problem is the Government has set its own timetable, tick tock, I feel a huge pressure build up happening. ?