- Joined
- 26 August 2021
- Posts
- 150
- Reactions
- 248
How could the Yank tech gurus get it so wrong??? I find it hard to believe the Chinese have found a way to undercut this tech by 20 fold.
China has a larger number of intelligent people than the USA, that is the main reason.How could the Yank tech gurus get it so wrong??? I find it hard to believe the Chinese have found a way to undercut this tech by 20 fold.
Cause the west did manufacture an effective vaccine?Mmm, the Chinese couldn’t manufacture an effective Covid vaccine.
I’m finding this tech advanced hard to believe.
20 fold cheaper than ChatGPT?
Ps why in the urnm thread?Cause the west did manufacture an effective vaccine?
I find it quite feasible as:
The pay of the it gurus in china are nearly a 10th of US
While startup people work their ass off in China and in the West, google or meta are not startup anymore.
I have no doubt whatsoever that the IT gurus in the fangs have to go thru their HR training, diversity reeducation, h&s workshop, etc etc and spend a lot of time replying to email chain BS.
So a 2x factor in efficiency easily reachable.
10 times cheaper, twice productivity and 1.5 billions of school educated pool to find the geniuses...
That's it.
India could match but their education system, class idiocy, poorer health and western deficiencies reduce their IQ pool.
So china advance doable, especially if you take a step back and do not try/can not compete by adding bigger tools
To an extreme, look at a WWII jeep, look at a Humvee, yet who had to piss of Afghanistan.
Bigger tools are not always the winners..and i prefer it that way
Because of the narrative of a future surge in energy demand to power AI and data centres. U.S Tech companies have been making commitments for supply of electricity from uranium power companies. From Market Matters today:why in the urnm thread?
True but if pricing is a 10th, expect demand to easily double vs more expensive options and power demand could easily make up...just sayingBecause of the narrative of a future surge in energy demand to power AI and data centres. U.S Tech companies have been making commitments for supply of electricity from uranium power companies. From Market Matters today:
"Several large US tech companies recently signed long term contracts for the supply of nuclear power to underpin their push into energy intensive AI. However, DeepSeek’s architecture claims to consume 40% less energy per task than traditional models. If true, this could be a game-changer in a world where sustainability targets seemed at odds with the thirst for energy from AI.
Lower energy intensity shown through DeepSeek’s technical release, if true, is a huge win for global energy demand, but not so good for Uranium stocks in the short term."
Even if the Nvidia panic is justified and we can do AI without large energy supplies the development of SMRs for power will be transformative. The search for smaller, cleaner reactors has accelerated and will be good for the sector.True but if pricing is a 10th, expect demand to easily double vs more expensive options and power demand could easily make up...just saying
Anyway, market trends and logic ...
The search for smaller, cleaner reactors has accelerated and will be good for the sector.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.