- Joined
- 24 February 2013
- Posts
- 765
- Reactions
- 1,251
I broadly think what you are saying is true but now is different to the 1980s and 1990s. There are now so many low cost ETFs available that will reliably give you almost the same return as the actual index. Whereas before those options were not available. So now people can genuinely approximate the market return rather than getting robbed with high fees by under-performing fund managers.Very salient story qldfrog. IMV goes to the heart of investing options generally offered to the every day punters.
In the 70's,80's, and 90's in fact all my life I have watched hosts of investment vehicles sold to millions of people as means to watch their money grow simply and painlessly. They were 10 year insurance investment schemes. Education funds for your children. Private Super schemes run by big name companies. I became very interested when I began investigating the charges and outcomes Insurance bonds and Super schemes my friends had been sold. It was clear the only people making big bucks were the sellers not the buyers
The "Financial Planning Industry" was developed in the 1980's as an "independent" advisory organisation ostensibly to help people make good decisions about where to invest their money and "make it grow". Again I saw scores- hundreds of investment opportunities sold to friends and family members as well as the broader community. Pine plantations, Jojoba Farms, Ostrich Investments, Macadamia Plantations. The list is endless. These were the agricultural side. Then there were the multitude of property investment groups promising huge returns on gilt edged mortgages. Scores of investment funds each promising a carefully curated, nimble approach to share-market investment that promised high returns .
It is all BS. Any cursory reading of ASF will throw up scores of examples of how unfit for purpose these financial vehicles have been. They certainly make money. But the money stops with dodgy investment projects sold by "independent" advisors all gaining commissions on the sales. The biggest commissions are offered y the biggest crooks.
VC and others talk of the value of compounding interest and long term investments. I have particular respect for VC and others who analyse businesses with clear eyes and forensic skill and identify quality opportunities. So certainly there are opportunities to invest wisely. But in my experience the success rate is far smaller than we would like to believe.
Share investment promotors endlessly recite the mantra of continualy increasing sharemarket indices to show that investment in shares will almost inevitably create wealth. I believe this is gross misrepresentaion of reality.
Stock Indices only measure successful stocks. All the failures get dropped off the index. Their losses are lost in history. Their place is taken by the next highrising stock. Of course the fact that a share price is $2-5-10-100 is absolutely no indication of actual profitability or long term success. But while that share is selling for $100 it is making the index look good. And a whole industry of buyers and sellers and promotors and grifters take their cut. And then it collapses and folds generally taking the "average" investors money to the grave. The "smart"money of course left years ago to jump onto the next big thing/con.
The smart money starts the company. Gives itself a 50% stake. Promotes and sells the idea. Builds an army of salespeople to sell the vision. It doesn't dirty itself with making the vision actually work or be profitable. The profit is in the sizzle not the steak.