- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 28,184
- Reactions
- 25,423
Third World countries becoming more affluent, they can afford the A/C now.Rising temperatures rising energy usage
Third World countries becoming more affluent, they can afford the A/C now.Rising temperatures rising energy usage
Regional Power Services have been doing it for years, when gas arrived at Port Headland the 13MW MWM diesels went to Costa Rica.WOW !! That seems amazingly good value. Obviously I don't know the size of the plants and perhaps the $15m was parts only not the whole reconstruction.
The critical point you raise Smurf is that creative, quality engineering could come up with solutions to refurbish/ rejig or create some new "break glass" option. Given that these units would only be intended for quite intermittent use it seems economically crazy to spend huge bucks on totally new gear vs a range of creative hacks.
Perhaps it would be an interesting "contest" for small engineering companies to come up with solutions. Some prizes and recognition at the end. ?
Regional Power Services have been doing it for years, when gas arrived at Port Headland the 13MW MWM diesels went to Costa Rica.
The main issue is, technology moves along and old technology becomes obsolete.
Yes you probably worked on the Blackstones at Denham, we replaced them with Cummins.Never got to see Redbank.... given my black out record probably just as well.![]()
I think most forget just how recent the mainstream use of air-conditioning really is.Third World countries becoming more affluent, they can afford the A/C now.![]()
BBC and The Guardian does not bring much balance, so lets say for the global warmist side ;-)Interesting and goes back to what I said early on in the thread, the enormity of the issue isn't recognised, not only does existing power stations have to be mitigated, but future growth has to be included.
It will all boil back to energy density in the end IMO.
The solution will become obvious, eventually.
![]()
40 percent of world's power clean but emissions rising - report
More clean electricity was generated in 2024 but there was a rise in the amount of coal and gas burnt too.www.bbc.com
More than 40 percent of the world's electricity was generated without burning fossil fuels in 2024, according to a new report from think-tank Ember.
But carbon dioxide emissions, which warm the planet, have risen to an all time high, the report says, with hot weather pushing up the overall demand for power.
Ember is a global energy think tank which has been predicting for several years that emissions of the climate warming gas carbon dioxide were about to start falling.
But this hasn't happened yet due to increasing global demand for electricity.
The report says that clean energy sources contributed more than 40% of global electricity generation for the first time since the 1940s. Back then demand was much lower, and hydroelectric power stations contributed a significant share.
The big picture is that the rise in the global demand for electricity continues to outpace the growth in renewable energy.
In the last five years, fast-growing Asian economies, in particular India and China, have continued expanding their use of fossil fuels to meet rapidly rising demand for electricity
Here is the Guardians take on it for the sake of balance![]()
Clean energy powered 40% of global electricity in 2024, report finds
Thinktank says solar has been fastest-growing energy source for last 20 years, but remains dwarfed by hydro powerwww.theguardian.com
Absolutely, when we moved to Exmouth in 1980 with a 1 and 2 year old, we had no A/C in the car or the house and for one period of 13 days or nights straight it never dropped below 36c.I think most forget just how recent the mainstream use of air-conditioning really is.
Cheaper mass market cars it's really only been standard since about the year 2000.
Not so much in hotter climates but in Vic or Tas it'd still be easy to find a home or small office or shop without it today.
By the way that 36c was the overnight minimum, during the day it was between 45c _ 47c. LolAbsolutely, when we moved to Exmouth in 1980 with a 1 and 2 year old, we had no A/C in the car or the house and for one period of 13 days or nights straight it never dropped below 36c.
I'm not complaining, just saying how times have changed.
Now the third world is starting to have the same expectations as us, which is understandable, so IMO there is no way with the energy density of renewables at the moment, they will be able to keep up.
But hey what do I know, I know SFA. Lol
As we keep saying time will tell, when Labor get in this time a lot of soul searching will go on.
Yes you probably worked on the Blackstones at Denham, we replaced them with Cummins.
I could be wrong, but I thought the ones we put in there were 200KVA 6cyl Cummins, but it was in the 1980's, a long time ago. LolPulled the alternator apart on the one nearest the wall there was a cat (200 kw?) helped a fitter do the over haul on it ran up to 100% could just about see through the exhaust glowing red to white.
There is no debate,The debate goes on.
![]()
In the debate between renewables and nuclear, some say it's 'game over'
While experts weigh in on the great energy debate, one builder says the industry has already made up its mind.www.abc.net.au
Not something I'm in any way involved with but apparently the basic sequence of events is:I can confirm that unit C3 tripped on 4th April and hasn't run since.
Hopefully a controlled vent in the boiler for such eventNot something I'm in any way involved with but apparently the basic sequence of events is:
Accumulated ash clinker fell inside boiler.
Flame out.
Pulverised fuel (coal) flow to boiler continued.
Ignition of pulverised fuel inside boiler > kaboom.
At this stage out of service until at least the end of May. That may well change however - it's the date they've given bearing in mind they're required to put a date on it, no guarantees it's accurate.
![]()
That that indicate lack of maintenance, or was it a freak event?Not something I'm in any way involved with but apparently the basic sequence of events is:
Accumulated ash clinker fell inside boiler.
Flame out.
Pulverised fuel (coal) flow to boiler continued.
Ignition of pulverised fuel inside boiler > kaboom.
At this stage out of service until at least the end of May. That may well change however - it's the date they've given bearing in mind they're required to put a date on it, no guarantees it's accurate.
![]()
Or just sxxt happensThat that indicate lack of maintenance, or was it a freak event?
Usually the furnace is inspected through viewing windows on a regular basis, when a large build up of clinker occurs, the unit is usually taken off line and high pressure water lances are used to blast the buildup off.Not something I'm in any way involved with but apparently the basic sequence of events is:
Accumulated ash clinker fell inside boiler.
Flame out.
Pulverised fuel (coal) flow to boiler continued.
Ignition of pulverised fuel inside boiler > kaboom.
At this stage out of service until at least the end of May. That may well change however - it's the date they've given bearing in mind they're required to put a date on it, no guarantees it's accurate.
![]()
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.