2014 Victorian Election

[SirRumpole]

I'm guessing that is either rhetorical or loaded ?

Yes I did law in QLD, engineering in WA, marketing in QLD and three technical trades, diplomas, etc. I have so many licences it cripples me financially. Even some Harvard stuff. You may rise Sir Knight

So they kept booting you out of Unis and you had to move states to try something else ?

 

[trainspotter]

I'm guessing that is either rhetorical or loaded ?

Yes I did law in QLD, engineering in WA, marketing in QLD and three technical trades, diplomas, etc. I have so many licences it cripples me financially. Even some Harvard stuff. You may rise Sir Knight

Tickets please. :1zhelp:

You might want to learn how to use grammar and spell check as well.

 

[explod]

If you want to believe those so called scientist so be it......it has already been proven earlier in this thread how inaccurate the IPPC reporting happens to be.

It is a shame you lower your self to personal insinuations......I do hope Joe Blow makes note of your remarks.

You are still off topic.

It was a very important issue in this capaign and is why the Greens continued to make inroads.

Over 90% of scientists agree that climate change is real and has largely accellerated due to cars, oil and coal.

The IPPC reports are in fact massaged down by Governments before release. And the methane content is also excluded.

The names you quoted back to me earlier today are part of the oil based governments cartel to discredit the real facts.

It is clearly set out in a book I quoted some time back on another thread, called "Climate Wars" the writer of which used to be the head geologist for over forty years for the major oil companies.

As time permits I will set it out again in detail in that other other thread.

But as an issue it is A political and this momenrum is going to rise to the tiop as people realise that we are in real trouble.

Ole Pal you have a distinct problem and as Basilio noted what you are saying in my words is crapola.

 

[Tisme]

So they kept booting you out of Unis and you had to move states to try something else ?

yeah that would be it

fricken peasants!!! :

Trainspotter I take it you are the resident spelling nazi that every board has and still uses bad grammar like "might want", splits infinitives, ends in prepositions, etc. all in one sentence?

 

[trainspotter]

yeah that would be it

fricken peasants!!! :

Trainspotter I take it you are the resident spelling nazi that every board has and still uses bad grammar like "might want", splits infinitives, ends in prepositions, etc. all in one sentence?

Not at all Tisme the exulted one. I am merely pointing out that a noteworthy individual as yourself "did" law then I am glad you are not representing me tis all Tisme.

 

[explod]

We do not need a slanging match and we are way off topic.

I have a uni honours degree and spell bad too. Its not important, it is the content of what yiu say and understand that is important.

So get over it or move on. We are talking about the state elections for victoria 2014.

And even though I do not support labor, most will agree that Daniel Andrews spoke eloquently the last few days with good content and delivery.

On another thread to come we will gradually guage whether he is any good or not.

Now working from my little tablet I may have some spelling mistakes, which are difficult to edit, but the message should be clear.

 

[trainspotter]

We do not need a slanging match and we are way off topic.

I have a uni honours degree and spell bad too. Its not important, it is the content of what yiu say and understand that is important.

A lawyer would "practice" law and not "did" law. Whatever.

 

[noco]

We do not need a slanging match and we are way off topic.

I have a uni honours degree and spell bad too. Its not important, it is the content of what yiu say and understand that is important.

So get over it or move on. We are talking about the state elections for victoria 2014.

And even though I do not support labor, most will agree that Daniel Andrews spoke eloquently the last few days with good content and delivery.

On another thread to come we will gradually guage whether he is any good or not.

Now working from my little tablet I may have some spelling mistakes, which are difficult to edit, but the message should be clear.

I am off topic again...just thought I would add a little mirth.

May I suggest you invest in a dictionary...I have one beside me all the time.....If I have to check the spelling or the meaning of a word, I read the whole page...it has been a great help to me.

I once had trouble saying my ABC.....I would go L M N O P S T........I was always slipping on my *RS*.

 

[explod]

I am off topic again...just thought I would add a little mirth.

May I suggest you invest in a dictionary...I have one beside me all the time.....If I have to check the spelling or the meaning of a word, I read the whole page...it has been a great help to me.

I once had trouble saying my ABC.....I would go L M N O P S T........I was always slipping on my *RS*.

Life is short noco and there is no time to bother with a dictionay on this notebook

On edit the page exposed is short and for the life of me I cannot get it to scroll down. That's why on longer posts it is worser at the end.

And as I say to younger ones around me these days, we have to keep going as hard as we can asere will be plenty of time to rest when were dead. So bugger the spelling lets check out this Andrews fella. Going over now, OUT.

 

[Julia]

Over 90% of scientists agree that climate change is real and has largely accellerated due to cars, oil and coal.

I keep reading this. It has become an oft repeated cliche seemingly on the basis that if you repeat something often enough the masses will accept it as true.

So, explod, could you please point me to a clear link which proves these 90% all agreeing that anthropogenic climate change is occurring? ie something other than just someone repeating it again? Or the usual bland statement by the IPCC which serves their own ends?

Perhaps a clear comment on the validity of the peer review process would help. If the peer review process is corrupted by any dissenting views not being accepted for publication, how valid can any ultimate conclusions be?

 

[Tisme]

A lawyer would "practice" law and not "did" law. Whatever.

I like your style.

 

[Tink]

Unions ready to stick out hands

DANIEL Andrews owes Victoria’s public-sector unions big time.

It wasn’t just the members of the Ambulance Employees Australia of Victoria, with their graffiti-covered vehicles outside polling stations, or the United Firefighters Union members doorknocking marginal seats.

The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation played its role, too.

The paramedics will want their long-running EBA dispute settled on favourable terms, even though the previous Government had basically given away everything there was to give away there.

The UFU will want the current court action by the MFB to cancel its EBA dropped. MFB management has argued that the current EBA effectively hands the union a veto of decision-making at every level of the organisation, a veto the UFU will be keen to maintain. The UFU will also be expecting the new Government to move forward on its long-running campaign for a fully paid, fully unionised CFA.

The nurses, too, have a shopping list for the new government. Nurse-patient ratios were once a matter for doctors and hospitals — a clinical and medical matter — not an IR matter.

Under the previous Labor Government, Victoria pioneered the way by enshrining them in industrial awards. Now the Premier-to-be has promised to write nurse-patient ratios into legislation.

What needs to be understood from the outset about this new government, however, is that the power and influence of the public-sector unions will stem not just from the major — indeed decisive — role they have played in its election, but from the fact that they are all part of the Left wing of the Labor Party.

Keeping the family happy will be a difficult and expensive task, as will dealing with the consequences if Mr Andrews pushes ahead with his plan to scrap the East West Link.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/vi.../story-fnocy1xj-1227140182034#social-comments

 

[SirRumpole]

I keep reading this. It has become an oft repeated cliche seemingly on the basis that if you repeat something often enough the masses will accept it as true.

So, explod, could you please point me to a clear link which proves these 90% all agreeing that anthropogenic climate change is occurring? ie something other than just someone repeating it again? Or the usual bland statement by the IPCC which serves their own ends?

Perhaps a clear comment on the validity of the peer review process would help. If the peer review process is corrupted by any dissenting views not being accepted for publication, how valid can any ultimate conclusions be?

I'm not explod, but you may be interested in this

http://www.theguardian.com/environm...treet-journal-denies-global-warming-consensus

 

[noco]

I'm not explod, but you may be interested in this

http://www.theguardian.com/environm...treet-journal-denies-global-warming-consensus

The good old "FABIAN" led newspaper...what else would you expect?...Originally run by the communist party.

It is very easy for them to fudge a percentage by being very selective......It is there way of promoting their propaganda.

Read "RESTORE AUSTRALIA"!!!!!!!!!! IiT EXPLAINS HOW THEY DO IT.

 

[SirRumpole]

The good old "FABIAN" led newspaper...what else would you expect?...Originally run by the communist party.

It is very easy for them to fudge a percentage by being very selective......It is there way of promoting their propaganda.

Read "RESTORE AUSTRALIA"!!!!!!!!!! IiT EXPLAINS HOW THEY DO IT.

Well noco, you just write to them and tell them where they went wrong in their research, and let us know what they say

 

[basilio]

So Noco you actually read the Guardian article ? the one that goes through the multiple peer reviewed studies which simply count up the myriads of scientific (no Andrew Bolt) peer reviewed papers on CC/global warming and related topics?

But of course a person who steadfastly believes that the BOM has fudged its own date nation wide and that we have no warming in Australia would have absolutely no problem just denouncing another half dozen reviews of 10,000 other papers would they they ?

 

[noco]

So Noco you actually read the Guardian article ? the one that goes through the multiple peer reviewed studies which simply count up the myriads of scientific (no Andrew Bolt) peer reviewed papers on CC/global warming and related topics?

But of course a person who steadfastly believes that the BOM has fudged its own date nation wide and that we have no warming in Australia would have absolutely no problem just denouncing another half dozen reviews of 10,000 other papers would they they ?

Of course I read it but do not believe it...The Guardian will always push this peer reviewed crap but tell me why don't they show some balance and publish articles by scientist who are skeptics?.......There are plenty out there, but the Guardian and the ABC will suppress them when ever they can.

I am sure you know why.....It is because the Guardian and the ABC are riddled with FABIANS to make sure their propaganda is pushed under the nose of the naive......push often enough and you will get them to believe it...

The Guardian is like the ABC....very very biased in deed.

I am sick to death of hearing about this Global Warming crap......there has been no Global Warming for 17 years.

 

[explod]

Global warming is not propoganda noco.

Get over it ole pal and move on.

Talk about the state election and what a great result it is for the people of Victoria.

 

[noco]

Global warming is not propoganda noco.

Get over it ole pal and move on.

Talk about the state election and what a great result it is for the people of Victoria.

Global Warming is propaganda pushed by the ABC and the Guardian.

Ah yes lets talk about the Victorian election....the CFMEU has now gained control of Victoria.....we will be watching Victoria sliding down the hill into the quagmire of bigger debt and deficit just like all the other Labor operations state and federal.

 

[SirRumpole]

Global Warming is propaganda pushed by the ABC and the Guardian.

And 97% of climate scientists

Ah yes lets talk about the Victorian election....the CFMEU has now gained control of Victoria.....we will be watching Victoria sliding down the hill into the quagmire of bigger debt and deficit just like all the other Labor operations state and federal.

How much money will Victoria save by not building the WestConnex (or whatever it's called) ?

This was a pork barrell election promise by the Federal and State Libs which backfired. Victorians obviously think there are better ways of spending the money, and as you don't live there I don't see how you can tell them what to think.