- Joined
- 13 February 2006
- Posts
- 5,068
- Reactions
- 11,489
tech/a
The current eight trades under; closed trades have returned on aggregate the 30%+/- in under the twelve month period, thus these results exceed the assertion originally stated.
The issue that you quite rightly raise has validity, however, you are raising it rather prematurely, based on the current evidence, as you posted a little ASX speccie that rose 400% in a couple of months. Therefore, market price can adjust very quickly based on sentiment.
Sentiment can change very quickly. Fundamentals can change quickly, but generally take a longer timeframe. Therefore, while evolving economic forces adjust the fundamentals of say, CQB, sentiment will be generally negative.
As the fundamentals improve, so the price [sentiment] can adjust very quickly.
The purpose of a fundamentally selected portfolio is to limit the losses. There are some six stocks showing currently circa 50% drawdown. This has without a doubt caused concern within the technical crowd. However, this is the point in which the time factor becomes important.
CAR provides a 25% dividend return on my purchase price, this approximates [without any capital gain] my requirement of 30% compounding, should I reinvest the dividends at the same price [or lower].
Therefore, on this stock, time, is less of a factor.
However, as we enter year two, [February 2007] I will need on closed trades an aggregate of 60% to maintain the stated 30%, and year three will require 90% on aggregate.
As first stated, there should be no losses.
From the trades taken initially, to the later trades, I have tightened three criteria. The result has been [so far] a very large reduction in drawdown [I dislike drawdown as much as anyone]. OFIX, WON, NAFC, CAR all suffered minimal drawdown. That said, there should be no losses, and an aggregate 30%+ after three years.
jog on
d998
I reckon your snaffoood.
Your plan is to prove that you can trade 30% or more each year over 3 yrs with your method.Pulling your trades out at 30 or so % leave you well short.
(You wouldnt be much better had you held them I worked it out--35%).
At the end of 3 yrs you will have to sell all losers---unless you dramatically increase your winning trades you have no hope!!
!
The current eight trades under; closed trades have returned on aggregate the 30%+/- in under the twelve month period, thus these results exceed the assertion originally stated.
The issue that you quite rightly raise has validity, however, you are raising it rather prematurely, based on the current evidence, as you posted a little ASX speccie that rose 400% in a couple of months. Therefore, market price can adjust very quickly based on sentiment.
Sentiment can change very quickly. Fundamentals can change quickly, but generally take a longer timeframe. Therefore, while evolving economic forces adjust the fundamentals of say, CQB, sentiment will be generally negative.
As the fundamentals improve, so the price [sentiment] can adjust very quickly.
The purpose of a fundamentally selected portfolio is to limit the losses. There are some six stocks showing currently circa 50% drawdown. This has without a doubt caused concern within the technical crowd. However, this is the point in which the time factor becomes important.
CAR provides a 25% dividend return on my purchase price, this approximates [without any capital gain] my requirement of 30% compounding, should I reinvest the dividends at the same price [or lower].
Therefore, on this stock, time, is less of a factor.
However, as we enter year two, [February 2007] I will need on closed trades an aggregate of 60% to maintain the stated 30%, and year three will require 90% on aggregate.
OR dramatically increase your % profit OR dramatically decrease your losses---currently all back to zero loss would do it
As first stated, there should be no losses.
From the trades taken initially, to the later trades, I have tightened three criteria. The result has been [so far] a very large reduction in drawdown [I dislike drawdown as much as anyone]. OFIX, WON, NAFC, CAR all suffered minimal drawdown. That said, there should be no losses, and an aggregate 30%+ after three years.
jog on
d998