Julia
In Memoriam
- Joined
- 10 May 2005
- Posts
- 16,986
- Reactions
- 1,973
Oh, to hell with that, Riddick. No one is going to take away my massage strength shower! I don't stand under it for long, but it's just wonderful.We do have a bunch of water saving features but the biggest one of these is simply low water system pressure. No massage strength showers, just gravity feed.
Seems pretty silly to me to focus on water pressure and low water delivery shower heads when people can stand under something that just piddles on them for half an hour if they choose.
Yes, I absolutely want a front and back lawn, yes I want to be able to wash the dog, yes I want to top up my swimming pool, and I'm quite prepared to pay for these privileges. We are not living in a third world country. We should be able to access decent quantity of water if we wish. The technology exists and charges can be made to consumers in accordance with the cost of running the source of supply.Until we make it more expensive or provide incentives to save water it simply will always be that australians will want their house and land package over sustainable urban design, it will be that australia will want a front and back lawn, feel the need to wash to dog, climb under the hose on a hot day. the list in endless.
Btw I also have rainwater tanks.
I'd say we have a political inertia problem.So I restate my initial assertion. we don;t have a water supply problem, we just have an chronic overuse problem.